By Eva García Donate
I just read it in one sitting, which means that I've been waiting. The plot keeps you waiting to the next event, that opens the curiosity to know more. Hypotheses are made about the relationships of the characters that appear.
I like that the horizon of the stories is not linear, and life is not linear itself. I am very interested, a question that lingers as you close the last page, in the reflection on the idea of fate. As in Greek tragedy, the pool of tragedy will be his fight against an inexorable fate, the cruel fate to which nothing is possible.
I've loved all the characters,and particularly, Manuela and Sinesio. They have the power and aura of special people and I think so starkly in intervening in their dialogues, leaving behind a residue of mystery, most is silent to what they say, something in common in both , they stand as the center of attention.
His counterpart is Daniel, a kind of man without a will, a perfect Bartleby (I love this metaphorical figure and I feel very identified with him) plays an important role, balancing the scales against invasive weight that occupe Manuela and Sinesio.
You include details on the scene that I think are suggestive, as the photograph of the bandaged body, I brought to mind a picture of Frida Kahlo that I've always been a disturbing effect. Or Lilliputian space inhabited by Monk, party room, half life...These are details that serve as visual half-open doors, projecting part of the story to unknown places that fail to be completed or closed. Like Carver's stories, such painstaking detail microhistories drawn from domestic and floating on an uncertain future.
The hardest part is that you have left, take this wonderful script to fruition. But in my humble and "crystal" opinión, the base you've built is very interesting.
thanks for entrusting me reading the script
Eva García Donate
No comments:
Post a Comment